Support Center > Search Results > SecureKnowledge Details
Check Point Clients' support on Windows 8 and 8.1 Technical Level
Solution

This article describes Check Point clients' support on Windows 8 and Windows 8.1.

Product Family Product Windows 8 32-bit/64-bit Windows 8.1

Remote Access Clients E75.30

SecuRemote, Check Point Mobile, Endpoint Security VPN

Supported for E75.30 and above

 Not Planned

Endpoint Security Client & Remote Access VPN Clients E80.51 (and above)

All Blades

Both Endpoint Security E80.41 and Remote Access Clients E80.41 support Windows 8.

Both Endpoint Security E80.50 and Remote Access Clients E80.50 support Windows 8.

Supported for E80.60 and above

Both Endpoint Security E80.42 and Remote Access Clients E80.42 support Windows 8.1 and Windows 8.1 UPDATE 1.

Both Endpoint Security E80.51 and Remote Access Clients E80.51 support Windows 8.1 and Windows 8.1 UPDATE 1.

Supported for E80.60 and above

Endpoint Security R73 Full Disk Encryption EW

Supported for FDE 7.5.1 EW and above

Supported for FDE 7.5.1 EW and above

Full Disk Encryption MI Not Planned Not Planned

Media Encryption R73

Not Planned

Not Planned

File Encryption R73 Not planned Not Planned
SecureAccess R73 Not Planned Not Planned
WebCheck R73 Not planned Not Planned
Other Clients SSL Network Extender Supported for R75 and above Supported from R77.10
SNX - AM Supported for R76 and above Supported from R77.10
Identity Awareness Supported for R75.40VS and above Supported for R77 and above
UserCheck Supported for R75.40 and above Supported for R77 and above 
Endpoint Security On Demand -  Compliance Scanner (ESOD CS)
Supported. Refer to sk87460 Supported for R77.10 and above
Endpoint Security On Demand -  SecureWorkspace (ESOD SWS)
Supported for R76 and above Supported for R77.10 and above

 

Important: The Check Point Mobile VPN plug-in is supported on Windows 8.1 ARM. See sk96006 (Check Point Mobile VPN plugin is now part of Windows 8.1 (including Windows RT 8.1))

 


 

Related Solutions:

Give us Feedback
Please rate this document
[1=Worst,5=Best]
Comment